https://forum.image.sc/t/new-version-of-vipsdisp-a-free-open-source-linux-image-viewer-for-very-large-images/70979
Seemed to work fine. On Manjaro GNU/Linux I had to install a library: openslide. After doing this, this program started fine.
https://forum.image.sc/t/new-version-of-vipsdisp-a-free-open-source-linux-image-viewer-for-very-large-images/70979
Seemed to work fine. On Manjaro GNU/Linux I had to install a library: openslide. After doing this, this program started fine.
I have been using Manjaro for years, now. Every so often I contemplate installing Arch, which I like, which is not polluted by Manjaro-specific tweaks; but (1) in spite of assurances, it is problematic to install; and (2) none of the other Arch-based distributions have worked well for me.
Today I want to mention and recommend Yazi, a text/terminal-based "file manager," similar to ranger and a few clones of ranger. Yazi is, in most respects, the best of the breed. Yazi, with a few tweaks and some steep uphill learning, made short work of culling some 150GB of images. No other tool has been as efficient. For me.
The home page for Yazi may be found here.
Here is where I mention the steep learning curve. The usage of this tool was not immediately apparent to me. This is probably on me; eventually, I found the keybindings in the Quick Start page on Yazi's home page. Not all of the key strokes were either easily understood, or found. On my MacBook, the color of my terminal interfered with those of Yazi, so I had to read further, and learn to install a theme; the concept and terminology of themes in Yazi were not intuitive. For me. Once I figured out how, it was possible to install a theme in the configuration file; various config files are located at ~/.config/yazi.
More information on plugins can be found here.
A rabbit hole was involved. But along the way I learned about several other tools that, amazingly, integrate seamlessly (sort of) with Yazi: fzf, zoxide, ripgrep, fd and others. This is a remarkably polished tool, for a package that has been undergoing rapid and apparently continuous development.
I recommend installing the development version, which is the default version of yazi in the Arch ecosystem's AUR repository. This enables some of the more advanced tools.
Fortunately , ranger, a tool I have used for years to browse and sort files and directories, does not work anymore---at least easily---for previewing images and PDFs. In desperation I reached out to Mr. Google, and discovered a few others. Nnn is unworkable. I has never worked out of the box, which was a show stopper for me. Some others exist. Yazi appeared out of the mists, and answered my call....
For now, links on the website of Yazi---a site that is well laid out---point to more information about plugins and other vagaries.
On the whole, Endeavour was overwritten in one day with Manjaro. Manjaro is easier to install, and the setup is familiar. This is regrettable, because I really want an easy-to-install Arch Linux, with Arch repos, without the manjaro overwatch.
About 15 years ago, Gentoo was my favorite distro. I did not like that updating required more than a day, in my aging (but not horribly ancient) hardware. Maybe it's time to try again?
Distrowatch's recently featured review of the Gentoo LiveCD received the highest KUDOs of any I have recently read. So shouldn't I try it?
The Live CD is nice. So I tried to install from the Live CD. There is no Calamares-equivalent installer. I followed all the steps. The Boot Manager did not work.
So I gave up. I have work to do. I cannot spend days installing a new OS. My machine might be up to Gentoo, but I'd have to rein in my penchant to update every few days.
I never got to find out whether KDE libraries are still a gordian knot on recent Gentoo. Also, it's a huge learning curve. Maybe I'll try one of the easy-to-install Gentoo shortcut distros, but my patience would be certain to be tested. There are too many steps for everything.
I might try again. Maybe on a clean machine. I want to try Apple Hardware.
The need for speed has me looking at MacBooks and Mac Minis.
The biggest need for me is an easier to use search function. The virtual folder feature is so clean and cool, it might be just what I need. Or maybe I'm fooling myself.
Manjaro is easy to install. It is my go to system recovery distro. Let me explain: The System Rescue CDs leave me at the lurch: I still have to dig around, and I don't do well at that. I'm what might be called a High-Skilled Linux User Without Computer Skills. I can run a system, but the finer points of system tweaking---involving programming---are a massive challenge.
I have work to do. GNU/Linux is my biggest ally, but I don't have time or inclination to spend more time, for example to learn to install Arch every few months. Arch's supporters say that the Arch installation process is a learning tool. I've learned it too many times already. Arch is easier than Gentoo. Gentoo is too much power; more than I can handle, and I cannot keep it on the road. Arch is the next step toward independence, but every time, I have ended up stepping on my toes, tripping myeself up, and having to re-install. Because it's easier to install (esp. with Manjaro) than to dive in to the problems. Even using the greatest help system: Google and the multitudes of users. I am so dependent on these folk. How can I repay it forward?
:-)
From DistroWatch.com
John Sulivan, the executive director of the Free software Foundation (FSF), has announced that Richard M. Stallman has resigned his position as president of the FSF. Stallman is best known for his work in creating the free software movement and starting the GNU project, which develops free software that is used by nearly all Linux distributions. Stallman's hard stance on software licensing, along with his controversial views on some social issues and brash communication style, have often made him a divisive figure in the free and open source software communities. This has occasionally led to people petitioning the FSF over the years, asking Stallman to step down.
The most recent controversy around Stallman gained more media attention than usual and resulted in several FSF members threatening to cancel their memberships. Members of the GNOME team announced their intention to cut ties with the FSF and GNU if Stallman did not leave his position. The Free Software Conservancy also placed a similar call for Stallman to step down, stating: "When considered with other reprehensible comments he has published over the years, these incidents form a pattern of behavior that is incompatible with the goals of the free software movement. We call for Stallman to step down from positions of leadership in our movement.". Stallman has also resigned his position at MIT, citing "a series of misunderstandings and mischaracterizations" as the reason for his departure.
I have no idea why. Stallman deserves a good deal more respect than he has gotten. Over the years, I have been sickened by comments I have seen on various mailing lists and forums. Many of them comprise little more than offhand name calling. No question, Richard Stallman's ideas are radical, when taken against the background of a society which is consumer centered and oriented around proprietary commercialism.
The best defense of Stallman is to point to the GNU Manifesto.
https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.en.html
Exa
Found on https://the.exa.website
I recently stumbled upon exa, a superior (IMHO) ls workalike. Exa is found on it's own web page. I installed it from the community repo on my Archlinux machine. It's a pretty amazing take, not only colorized but with some excellent features as well. I have found it a pleasant alternative. My bash aliases:
alias lsl='ls -lrt --color=auto'
alias lsla='ls -lrta --color=auto'
alias le='exa'
alias lel='exa --long'
alias lela='exa --long --all'
alias let='exa --tree'
On the exa web site is found comprehensive documentation of the numerous options.
UPDATE (July3, 2024): Eza is a community fork of Exa. I will use that now.
Kitty :: "the fast, featureful, GPU-based terminal emulator"
Found on https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/
The git repo is at https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty
Of late, I have struggled with terminal emulators. The well known xrvxt was difficult---for me---to set up. On my archlinux and manjaro boxes, kitty has great colors, and it is simple. I am intrigued with the "gpu based" part of the description. I am uncertain how much advantage is derived from being gpu-based, or whether I need to take special steps to compile it with support for my gpu. For now, it seems quick. I have little need at this point for extra features. The developer of kitty, Kovid Goyal, has produced some other intriguing pieces, including Calibre and an interesting keyboard-based browser, vise.
I am puzzled that I have not been able to use kitty consistently in my dropdown / scratchpad-based terminal setup---borrowed from Luke Smith. The reasons for this elude me. I can only imagine that an entire world exists consisting of the meta data and meta functions of terminals. I have tried urxvt, su, xfce4-terminal, alacritty (another "gpu-based" terminal),
Others: a short list of programs useful to me:
For me, Free Software is a big deal. My first whiff of it came from an article in InfoWorld, which I had subscribed to because I was interested in computers, and because it's free. An article was describing or announcing something to do with the Free Software Foundation (FSF). I had been standing on the precipice of a project to collect animal names in the language(s) of Chuuk Lagoon, where I was living, teaching, and learning. My intention was to learn the names of animals so I couild discuss them with local fishermen, in furtherance of my plan to study traditional knowledge of marine life.
I had received a computer as a gift from my mother, a Toshiba laptop, a really nice one. But my mother did not understand that to use a computer, one needs software. I might have had Microsoft word; I don't remember. I had been living off-the-grid on the island of Tol, using a 10 Watt solar panel to trickle charge a 100 Amp-Hour deep cycle battery that had been given to me by someone in the U. S. Airforce CAT Team (short for Civic Action Team). I also had a portable HP printer that I rigged up to run off of 12 Volts. Software was the week link in my plan to "digitize" the names I had been writing down.
During my time in Chuuk, I had become known for my interest in animal names and any thing at all about the behavior, ecology...anything...about marine animals. And about fishing. Actually more just about ANYTHING anyone could talk to me about, pertinent to marine life. Students were my teachers.
I had tried to write the names down using the rudimentary editing software I had---possibly Microsoft Word. But I could not easily write the diacritic marks used for some vowels in writing Chuukese. I had approached some linguists at the University of Hawaii. One of them, Robert Hsu, was kind enough to send a "demonstration copy" of an editor called "Multi-Edit" that was capable of doing what I had in mind. One of the tricks among software vendors is to disseminate these demo, or evaluation, copies, but charge high prices for a full functioning copy. I was working at a local Junior High School; my take-home pay was barely enough to cover food for the extended family of my wife. To obtain the fullly enabled copy of the cripple-ware program Multi-Edit, together with a manual, would cost 300.00. Not a chance.
I tried all kinds of things to try to learn how to type diacritics in Multi-Edit, but had failed. When I saw the words "Free Software Foundation" in a small one-column article, fewer than 15 lines long, my imagination ran wild.
That was a time before the Internet had grown into what has now become. Snail mail was the only mail, and on islands like Tol, accessible only by motor boat, and with not mail delivery, the "snails" servicing the mail were extremely slow. I was spending way too much money on stamps in those days. I wrote the FSF.
Most of my letters never elicited a reply. I was, therefore, shocked to receive a small box from the FSF some weeks later! I had described my lexicon project in my letter to the FSF. Whoever had read my letter must have understood my plea: I had received over 10 of those plastic 3-1/2" disks full of free software compiled for Microsoft Windows. Remarkably, included in this package were a number of the Unix text tools, for sorting and manipulating text---beyond my wildest dreams. And, of course, GNU/Emacs, in the form called "Demacs," a version ported to Microsoft Windows by two Japanese workers. The unix tools were ported very early during the seminal stages of the Cygwin Project.
These tools were immediately useful to me. The biggest deal for me was that Emacs comes with documentation built in, as TexInfo files. Within a shoret time I was able to figure out how to type in diacritical marks. At the time, I had plenty of free time, so I was able to read most of the documentation, and set up Emacs to work for me, for useful work. My innovations, made over the years, are still included in my init file!
The FSF produced a "GNUS Bulletin", I think quarterly. I had become a believer in this software, and I read the GNUS/Bull from cover to cover. At some point after a couple of years, a small article in the GNUS/Bull announced that two unix clone operating systems had become available: Linux was one; the other was Free BSD. When I traveled to Guam, I was able---with help---to download an early version of Slackware Linux.
GNU/Linux had me, right from the start. Free Software enabled my project. Operating System it has been built by community action. This story has been told many times. Seldom has it gained traction. But still, GNU/Linux is a phenomenon.
As a teacher, at my schools were to be found dedicated administrators: that is, dedicated to buying all the possible proprietary software that government money could buy. I knew that GNU/Linux was superior. But it required some learning. I taught some of my students to install and use GNU/Linux systems, and to build computers from parts.
Where I'm coming from:
One of the things I like the best about GNU is the Man Pages. It was, I think, a mandate: anyone can write a utility for a Unix-like Operating System, a system which is made up of multitudinous little programs that work together. Today, it is becoming more common NOT to follow that convention.
The man page format is something else, however: it seems to assume that the GNU/Linux user (and any Unix-like OS user) is able to read that crazy listing of arcane specs about a program.
TLDR solves my problem, which is the inconvenience of reading through a lengthy man page to figure out how to run a program.
Then I can consult a man page for more focused in advice.
Several utilities to ease the pain of working with a single monitor [UPDATED October 16, 2026 with more utilities, and some edits on the...